Ad@m\'s BLOG (page 2)


Advanced search

Message boards : SZTAKI Desktop Grid : Ad@m\'s BLOG (page 2)

AuthorMessage
Profile kadam
Project administrator
Avatar
Send message
Joined: May 25 05
Posts: 589
Credit: 38,614
RAC: 0
Message 1253 - Posted 10 Dec 2005 21:51:58 UTC

    I thought I would start another page so those with a slow connection can also read this...
    ____________
    If you like BOINC, you may also find CaretCursor to be appealing.

    Profile Nightbird
    Forum moderator
    Avatar
    Send message
    Joined: Jul 12 05
    Posts: 920
    Credit: 114,924
    RAC: 0
    Message 1256 - Posted 10 Dec 2005 21:56:35 UTC

      Last modified: 10 Dec 2005 21:59:45 UTC

      New server version, new nice home page
      so new page ;)



      ____________

      Profile kadam
      Project administrator
      Avatar
      Send message
      Joined: May 25 05
      Posts: 589
      Credit: 38,614
      RAC: 0
      Message 1258 - Posted 10 Dec 2005 22:00:02 UTC

        Last modified: 10 Dec 2005 22:00:31 UTC

        Since with the old NumSysSearch application the processing of dim11 would lasted forever the new application features an estimation whether the given interval would contain something interesting or not. That\'s why there are some quick workunits, which failed this estimation so the application doesn\'t count through the whole interval. However, we can\'t give out longer intervals, because if the application estimates that the given interval should be examined deeper, than it would last forever to finish a longer wu, thus resulting to fail the deadline...
        ____________
        If you like BOINC, you may also find CaretCursor to be appealing.

        Profile kadam
        Project administrator
        Avatar
        Send message
        Joined: May 25 05
        Posts: 589
        Credit: 38,614
        RAC: 0
        Message 1262 - Posted 10 Dec 2005 22:08:35 UTC

          Last modified: 10 Dec 2005 22:08:51 UTC

          So, as you can see we\'ve finally managed to upgrade the server. Although it\'s still far from perfect, but I hope that with your help we can make it perfect soon...

          Richard Maths 1
          Send message
          Joined: Aug 16 05
          Posts: 43
          Credit: 9,526
          RAC: 0
          Message 1270 - Posted 10 Dec 2005 22:35:24 UTC

            Adam,

            Wonderful webpages!!
            Glad you answered the question about how short these new WU\'s are.

            I have noticed that the information from SZTAKI is not being updated on BOINCstats. Is the data not available to BOINCstats? Does this have something to do with SZTAKI not putting out the data due to the upgrade?

            Richar
            ____________

            Profile Nightbird
            Forum moderator
            Avatar
            Send message
            Joined: Jul 12 05
            Posts: 920
            Credit: 114,924
            RAC: 0
            Message 1273 - Posted 10 Dec 2005 22:40:13 UTC - in response to Message 1258.

              Since with the old NumSysSearch application the processing of dim11 would lasted forever the new application features an estimation whether the given interval would contain something interesting or not. That\'s why there are some quick workunits, which failed this estimation so the application doesn\'t count through the whole interval. However, we can\'t give out longer intervals, because if the application estimates that the given interval should be examined deeper, than it would last forever to finish a longer wu, thus resulting to fail the deadline...

              I\'m not sure that i understood :(

              ____________

              Profile Cori
              Avatar
              Send message
              Joined: Jul 13 05
              Posts: 320
              Credit: 4,856
              RAC: 0
              Message 1283 - Posted 11 Dec 2005 10:06:35 UTC - in response to Message 1273.

                Last modified: 11 Dec 2005 10:20:47 UTC

                I\'m not sure that i understood :(

                Same for me ;) But at least we know that the WUs are not failing...it\'s just a little lottery to get those which are running some minutes :)
                ____________
                Greetings, Cori

                Hans Sveen
                Send message
                Joined: Jul 12 05
                Posts: 21
                Credit: 131,096
                RAC: 0
                Message 1285 - Posted 11 Dec 2005 12:50:48 UTC

                  Hi!
                  Seems like the latest wu\'s I have received will last for about an hour, so everything(almost,see my note further down this message!). Seems like the sorting of the dim 11 wu\'s work!
                  Thank You again Adam , this short wu\'s were a smart move!

                  Just a couple of minor \"bugs\"; 1st one, the addons link don\'t work neither on the english or hungarian site. The second one is that the FAQ on the English site still is in Hungarian! The last one is that on the Hungarian site the Rules and Policies is in English.

                  Thank again for a very nice and easy GUI, keep up the good work.

                  Long live applied mathematics with some help of Boinc!


                  ____________
                  Hans Sveen
                  Oslo, Norway


                  Profile Nightbird
                  Forum moderator
                  Avatar
                  Send message
                  Joined: Jul 12 05
                  Posts: 920
                  Credit: 114,924
                  RAC: 0
                  Message 1286 - Posted 11 Dec 2005 14:25:40 UTC

                    Seems like the latest wu\'s I have received will last for about an hour ...).

                    Same here now.
                    ____________

                    Profile Cori
                    Avatar
                    Send message
                    Joined: Jul 13 05
                    Posts: 320
                    Credit: 4,856
                    RAC: 0
                    Message 1287 - Posted 11 Dec 2005 14:31:04 UTC

                      Last modified: 11 Dec 2005 14:37:38 UTC

                      My WUs are also longer now, but you better don\'t shut down BOINC manager, because then the WUs start from zero again :(

                      Edit: No problem noticed so far when the manager switches to another project.
                      ____________
                      Greetings, Cori

                      Profile Stefan Ledwina
                      Avatar
                      Send message
                      Joined: Nov 9 05
                      Posts: 25
                      Credit: 10,000
                      RAC: 0
                      Message 1289 - Posted 11 Dec 2005 16:36:16 UTC

                        Adam could you please add checkpoints to new WUs? After rebooting my computer I lost 1 hour of work because there are no checkpoints... I know 1 hour of work is not much but it must not be...
                        Thanks for the great job you´re doing here!

                        Greetings Stefan
                        ____________

                        last.fm BOINC users group

                        Profile Stefan Ledwina
                        Avatar
                        Send message
                        Joined: Nov 9 05
                        Posts: 25
                        Credit: 10,000
                        RAC: 0
                        Message 1290 - Posted 11 Dec 2005 19:12:39 UTC

                          I have seen there must be checkpoints... I thought there are none because after rebooting the WUs started at 0 %. But after a few minutes the jumped to the percentage they had before... :-)

                          Greetz Stefan
                          ____________

                          last.fm BOINC users group

                          christian barrett
                          Avatar
                          Send message
                          Joined: Jul 12 05
                          Posts: 9
                          Credit: 17,601
                          RAC: 0
                          Message 1291 - Posted 12 Dec 2005 2:50:52 UTC

                            i had 1.5 hours into mine but needed to reboot. when i came back up, it wiped the time and restarted the unit at zero. It backs up Cori\'s observation.
                            ____________

                            madmac
                            Avatar
                            Send message
                            Joined: Sep 22 05
                            Posts: 27
                            Credit: 1,483
                            RAC: 0
                            Message 1293 - Posted 12 Dec 2005 10:10:35 UTC

                              I too am agreeing with Cori, after one hour work last night and had to switch off after Boinc did another project. When I restarted this morning it was 0% until Sztaki ran after one hour , just checked manager it had run one hour and was only showing about one hour, so no checkpoints. Can Adam please put them in, so that we do not have to begin again.

                              Thank you if you can.
                              ____________

                              Profile Stefan Ledwina
                              Avatar
                              Send message
                              Joined: Nov 9 05
                              Posts: 25
                              Credit: 10,000
                              RAC: 0
                              Message 1294 - Posted 12 Dec 2005 11:31:40 UTC

                                Last modified: 12 Dec 2005 11:32:11 UTC

                                I think there are checkpoints because after rebooting my computer a WU that had 80% before, started at 0% but after a few minutes it jumped to 89%...
                                But only Adam knows... :-)
                                ____________

                                last.fm BOINC users group

                                madmac
                                Avatar
                                Send message
                                Joined: Sep 22 05
                                Posts: 27
                                Credit: 1,483
                                RAC: 0
                                Message 1295 - Posted 12 Dec 2005 12:18:53 UTC

                                  Well I have upgraded today from 5.2.6 to 5.2.13 and it has restarted at 0%, so maybe there is no checkpoints in the WU and you were lucky.
                                  ____________

                                  Profile Cori
                                  Avatar
                                  Send message
                                  Joined: Jul 13 05
                                  Posts: 320
                                  Credit: 4,856
                                  RAC: 0
                                  Message 1298 - Posted 12 Dec 2005 23:30:04 UTC

                                    Last modified: 12 Dec 2005 23:31:53 UTC

                                    The funny thing was that only the shutdown of the boinc manager (version 5.2.13) caused any problems: the crunching time was about 01 h 10 mins (90% progress), when I exited Boinc and then the WU started from zero without remembering how far it has already been processed. It took me of course the same time again to finish the WU ;)

                                    But the regular switching of projects worked fine, I was even able to suspend/resume the Sztaki-WUs manually... So what I can\'t figure out: if there were no checkpoints at all, the problem should have occured also when suspending the WU!?

                                    The only thing I noticed earlier sometimes (and which may cause trouble) might be the BOINC program itself, when boinc.exe remains active after exiting the manager.
                                    But I really don\'t know if this was happening here :(
                                    ____________
                                    Greetings, Cori

                                    Richard Maths 1
                                    Send message
                                    Joined: Aug 16 05
                                    Posts: 43
                                    Credit: 9,526
                                    RAC: 0
                                    Message 1300 - Posted 13 Dec 2005 1:45:41 UTC

                                      Adam,
                                      How are credits calculated? I thought I knew.
                                      Here is a case where I was the 3rd one (2633)to return the WU. The 4th got credit and I received 0.
                                      I have several cases of getting 0 credit.

                                      63287 5029 11 Dec 2005 19:10:38 UTC 11 Dec 2005 23:23:20 UTC Over Success Done 5,476.70 9.33 9.33
                                      63288 2633 11 Dec 2005 19:10:44 UTC 12 Dec 2005 6:29:06 UTC Over Success Done 4,440.23 9.02 0.00
                                      63289 260 11 Dec 2005 19:19:12 UTC 12 Dec 2005 17:19:21 UTC Over Success Done 4,133.47 18.64 9.33
                                      63290 6120 11 Dec 2005 19:18:07 UTC 11 Dec 2005 21:33:51 UTC Over Success Done 3,272.52 5.65 0.00


                                      Thanks for looking into this,
                                      Richard
                                      ____________

                                      Profile Keck_Komputers
                                      Avatar
                                      Send message
                                      Joined: Sep 18 05
                                      Posts: 16
                                      Credit: 7,898
                                      RAC: 0
                                      Message 1302 - Posted 13 Dec 2005 2:57:24 UTC - in response to Message 1298.

                                        The funny thing was that only the shutdown of the boinc manager (version 5.2.13) caused any problems: the crunching time was about 01 h 10 mins (90% progress), when I exited Boinc and then the WU started from zero without remembering how far it has already been processed. It took me of course the same time again to finish the WU ;)

                                        But the regular switching of projects worked fine, I was even able to suspend/resume the Sztaki-WUs manually... So what I can\'t figure out: if there were no checkpoints at all, the problem should have occured also when suspending the WU!?

                                        The only thing I noticed earlier sometimes (and which may cause trouble) might be the BOINC program itself, when boinc.exe remains active after exiting the manager.
                                        But I really don\'t know if this was happening here :(

                                        The BOINC client automatically suspends to memory if no checkpoint has been reached when switching projects. As long as you do not restart the client or the computer it will pick up again when it restarts.
                                        ____________
                                        BOINC WIKI

                                        BOINCing since 2002/12/8

                                        Profile [B^S] thierry@home
                                        Avatar
                                        Send message
                                        Joined: Jul 12 05
                                        Posts: 98
                                        Credit: 255,646
                                        RAC: 0
                                        Message 1303 - Posted 13 Dec 2005 20:05:10 UTC

                                          I have also some WU that are Over, Sucess, Done with zero credits : 14539, 16774 and 18314.
                                          The credit is not a problem for those three (they are quite little). I just wonder why.


                                          ____________

                                          Profile kadam
                                          Project administrator
                                          Avatar
                                          Send message
                                          Joined: May 25 05
                                          Posts: 589
                                          Credit: 38,614
                                          RAC: 0
                                          Message 1323 - Posted 14 Dec 2005 21:51:06 UTC

                                            So far I couldn\'t find out why does boinc refuses to grant credit for the small WUs. The only solution I could come up with (which also solves the checkpoint problem) is generating new WUs containing smaler intervals, but much more of them.

                                            The problem with the WUs was that they contained only a few, but wider number-intervals to be searched. Most of them would fail the prediction of wheter the given interval would contain anything useful or not. That\'s why some of the WUs completed really fast, because all of the intervals failed the prediction and considered to be unnecessary.

                                            Now what we\'ve come up with is to break down the wide number-intervals to smaller ones and put more into one WU. This makes checkpointing more effective and hopefully results in a fair credit granting...

                                            Profile kadam
                                            Project administrator
                                            Avatar
                                            Send message
                                            Joined: May 25 05
                                            Posts: 589
                                            Credit: 38,614
                                            RAC: 0
                                            Message 1347 - Posted 16 Dec 2005 0:14:07 UTC - in response to Message 1323.

                                              Last modified: 16 Dec 2005 0:34:34 UTC

                                              It seems that the new WU layout works and the system is stable, so there is nothing that could stop us now from reaching beyond 500 GFlops.

                                              I do owe you one more thing. The linux client, to be compiled with older glibc. I\'m on it, I just got distracted by university. We\'re approaching the exams...yep, my favortie part of the year.


                                              ____________
                                              If you like BOINC, you may also find CaretCursor to be appealing.

                                              Hermes
                                              Send message
                                              Joined: Jul 14 05
                                              Posts: 9
                                              Credit: 12,561
                                              RAC: 0
                                              Message 1348 - Posted 16 Dec 2005 1:42:53 UTC - in response to Message 1347.

                                                It seems that the new WU layout works and the system is stable, so there is nothing that could stop us now from reaching beyond 500 GFlops.


                                                That is: nothing but the daily quota bug.
                                                After almost 3 days of waiting I finally got a new WU. My computer immediatly began the immensly time consuming task of calculating the problem. It was a hard fight. And for al long time it was unclear, who would be the winner. But after 3 (in words: three) seconds (!) the solution was found. Now I will have to wait another 3 days before I get the next WU.

                                                TBC
                                                ____________

                                                Profile kadam
                                                Project administrator
                                                Avatar
                                                Send message
                                                Joined: May 25 05
                                                Posts: 589
                                                Credit: 38,614
                                                RAC: 0
                                                Message 1350 - Posted 16 Dec 2005 6:25:27 UTC - in response to Message 1348.

                                                  Last modified: 16 Dec 2005 6:25:44 UTC

                                                  That is: nothing but the daily quota bug.
                                                  After almost 3 days of waiting I finally got a new WU. My computer immediatly began the immensly time consuming task of calculating the problem. It was a hard fight. And for al long time it was unclear, who would be the winner. But after 3 (in words: three) seconds (!) the solution was found. Now I will have to wait another 3 days before I get the next WU.

                                                  TBC


                                                  That is, sorry! I was a bit tired yesterday evening and forgot about that. I\'ll seek & destroy that problem...
                                                  ____________
                                                  If you like BOINC, you may also find CaretCursor to be appealing.

                                                  Profile kadam
                                                  Project administrator
                                                  Avatar
                                                  Send message
                                                  Joined: May 25 05
                                                  Posts: 589
                                                  Credit: 38,614
                                                  RAC: 0
                                                  Message 1351 - Posted 16 Dec 2005 13:14:25 UTC

                                                    OK, I\'m going to have a calm 3 hour long train-trip, where I\'ll have time to read through the LHC forums, on the solution of the venue problem. Hope it helps to figure out what the problem is...
                                                    ____________
                                                    If you like BOINC, you may also find CaretCursor to be appealing.

                                                    Profile Nightbird
                                                    Forum moderator
                                                    Avatar
                                                    Send message
                                                    Joined: Jul 12 05
                                                    Posts: 920
                                                    Credit: 114,924
                                                    RAC: 0
                                                    Message 1363 - Posted 17 Dec 2005 13:48:33 UTC - in response to Message 1351.

                                                      Last modified: 17 Dec 2005 13:49:08 UTC

                                                      OK, I\'m going to have a calm 3 hour long train-trip, where I\'ll have time to read through the LHC forums, on the solution of the venue problem. Hope it helps to figure out what the problem is...

                                                      This venue problem is important, Adam
                                                      All seems \"corrupted\" and look at (your) stats on BoincSynergy :
                                                      (CPU Vendor/Model, CPUs, Operating System)...

                                                      For you :
                                                      CPU Vendor/Model : 744085000.460737 1525761934.09399
                                                      CPUs : 0
                                                      Operating System : 531021824

                                                      ALL your crunchers have the problem.


                                                      ____________

                                                      Profile Contact
                                                      Avatar
                                                      Send message
                                                      Joined: Jul 12 05
                                                      Posts: 22
                                                      Credit: 98,383
                                                      RAC: 0
                                                      Message 1364 - Posted 17 Dec 2005 14:47:51 UTC - in response to Message 1351.

                                                        ...on the solution of the venue problem...


                                                        I remember John Keck posting somewhere that this problem was due to not running the database update script. The newer database has more columns?
                                                        Nightbird\'s observation seems to confirm incorrect column parse.
                                                        ____________

                                                        Click and enter your name for your BOINC Statistics

                                                        Profile Keck_Komputers
                                                        Avatar
                                                        Send message
                                                        Joined: Sep 18 05
                                                        Posts: 16
                                                        Credit: 7,898
                                                        RAC: 0
                                                        Message 1367 - Posted 17 Dec 2005 23:51:18 UTC - in response to Message 1364.

                                                          Last modified: 17 Dec 2005 23:53:31 UTC

                                                          ...on the solution of the venue problem...


                                                          I remember John Keck posting somewhere that this problem was due to not running the database update script. The newer database has more columns?
                                                          Nightbird\'s observation seems to confirm incorrect column parse.

                                                          I was mistaken. In another thread Adam mentioned that he had run the update script so there is something else going on.

                                                          I wonder if one of the back-end processes did not get updated (validator, assimilator, ect.). This process could be writing the information in the wrong place and screwing things up. You would think that by using symbolic links that would not be a problem but you never know.

                                                          edit: LHC was the other project that had this problem, maybe searching the boards there or pinging the devlopers would get Adam on the right track.
                                                          ____________
                                                          BOINC WIKI

                                                          BOINCing since 2002/12/8

                                                          Profile Keck_Komputers
                                                          Avatar
                                                          Send message
                                                          Joined: Sep 18 05
                                                          Posts: 16
                                                          Credit: 7,898
                                                          RAC: 0
                                                          Message 1368 - Posted 18 Dec 2005 0:18:03 UTC - in response to Message 1367.

                                                            ...on the solution of the venue problem...


                                                            I remember John Keck posting somewhere that this problem was due to not running the database update script. The newer database has more columns?
                                                            Nightbird\'s observation seems to confirm incorrect column parse.

                                                            I was mistaken. In another thread Adam mentioned that he had run the update script so there is something else going on.

                                                            I wonder if one of the back-end processes did not get updated (validator, assimilator, ect.). This process could be writing the information in the wrong place and screwing things up. You would think that by using symbolic links that would not be a problem but you never know.

                                                            edit: LHC was the other project that had this problem, maybe searching the boards there or pinging the devlopers would get Adam on the right track.

                                                            I went and searched the LHC forums. They had to install a new validator and assimilator to get this fixed.
                                                            ____________
                                                            BOINC WIKI

                                                            BOINCing since 2002/12/8

                                                            Profile Contact
                                                            Avatar
                                                            Send message
                                                            Joined: Jul 12 05
                                                            Posts: 22
                                                            Credit: 98,383
                                                            RAC: 0
                                                            Message 1369 - Posted 18 Dec 2005 1:33:05 UTC - in response to Message 1368.

                                                              I went and searched the LHC forums. They had to install a new validator and assimilator to get this fixed.

                                                              Brilliant! Thanks once again John.
                                                              Only after your answer do I think to search for myself.

                                                              http://lhcathome.cern.ch/forum_thread.php?id=1777

                                                              leads to the answer here:

                                                              http://lhcathome.cern.ch/forum_thread.php?id=1784

                                                              Fingers crossed.


                                                              ____________

                                                              Click and enter your name for your BOINC Statistics

                                                              Profile Bill Michael
                                                              Avatar
                                                              Send message
                                                              Joined: Aug 7 05
                                                              Posts: 42
                                                              Credit: 45,225
                                                              RAC: 945
                                                              Message 1378 - Posted 19 Dec 2005 12:46:22 UTC

                                                                So glad we had the long delay so it could all be \"tested\"...

                                                                Profile kadam
                                                                Project administrator
                                                                Avatar
                                                                Send message
                                                                Joined: May 25 05
                                                                Posts: 589
                                                                Credit: 38,614
                                                                RAC: 0
                                                                Message 1400 - Posted 21 Dec 2005 16:52:58 UTC - in response to Message 1378.

                                                                  I\'m over all of my exams for this years (more to come in january :-), so I can concentrate on the venue and quota problem.
                                                                  I\'ve examined the formus of LHC, and most probably the source of our problem will be within the assimilator\'s code, but I can\'t really understand it, how could it relate, because the assimilating process has nothing to do with the OS-type, and the venue. I still have to do some research on the topic, but I\'m on it and trying to solve it. Sorry for the caused inconvinience...
                                                                  ____________
                                                                  If you like BOINC, you may also find CaretCursor to be appealing.

                                                                  Richard Maths 1
                                                                  Send message
                                                                  Joined: Aug 16 05
                                                                  Posts: 43
                                                                  Credit: 9,526
                                                                  RAC: 0
                                                                  Message 1402 - Posted 21 Dec 2005 16:57:52 UTC - in response to Message 1400.

                                                                    I\'m over all of my exams for this years (more to come in january :-), so I can concentrate on the venue and quota problem.
                                                                    I\'ve examined the formus of LHC, and most probably the source of our problem will be within the assimilator\'s code, but I can\'t really understand it, how could it relate, because the assimilating process has nothing to do with the OS-type, and the venue. I still have to do some research on the topic, but I\'m on it and trying to solve it. Sorry for the caused inconvinience...


                                                                    Look at the interaction of BOINC 5.2.13 with SZTAKI. I am still running v.4.45 and have not had the quota problem nor the no work problem as others have had.
                                                                    I just wrote notes in both the \"quota\" and \"no work\" messages. You probably need to look at the \"no work\" issue also.
                                                                    Thanks,
                                                                    Richard
                                                                    ____________

                                                                    Profile Keck_Komputers
                                                                    Avatar
                                                                    Send message
                                                                    Joined: Sep 18 05
                                                                    Posts: 16
                                                                    Credit: 7,898
                                                                    RAC: 0
                                                                    Message 1407 - Posted 22 Dec 2005 10:19:08 UTC - in response to Message 1400.

                                                                      I\'m over all of my exams for this years (more to come in january :-), so I can concentrate on the venue and quota problem.
                                                                      I\'ve examined the formus of LHC, and most probably the source of our problem will be within the assimilator\'s code, but I can\'t really understand it, how could it relate, because the assimilating process has nothing to do with the OS-type, and the venue. I still have to do some research on the topic, but I\'m on it and trying to solve it. Sorry for the caused inconvinience...


                                                                      But if the assimilator is putting stuff in the wrong column of the database everything after that column will be one off, even if it does not directly use those fields.

                                                                      At LHC it was pretty clearly anything after the CPU name was messed up, and one column off. It does not seem to be as clearly difined on this project (or I\'m just missing some info). Plus I do not remember them having the problem with the quotas being misused. The quotas were off but it seems like if your quota of 5 was used you really got 5 workunits.
                                                                      ____________
                                                                      BOINC WIKI

                                                                      BOINCing since 2002/12/8

                                                                      Profile Michael Roberts
                                                                      Avatar
                                                                      Send message
                                                                      Joined: Sep 6 05
                                                                      Posts: 5
                                                                      Credit: 27,098
                                                                      RAC: 0
                                                                      Message 1415 - Posted 22 Dec 2005 19:30:45 UTC

                                                                        I am not at present having quota problems (running Boinc 5.2.13) after updating SZTAKI\'s resource share. Perhaps previous configurations have not been transferred correctly during the upgrade to the version 5 server and they get corrected when the account is updated by the user?

                                                                        I am still seeing silly venues, so there may be two separate problems.
                                                                        ____________

                                                                        selo
                                                                        Send message
                                                                        Joined: Sep 10 05
                                                                        Posts: 7
                                                                        Credit: 15,726
                                                                        RAC: 0
                                                                        Message 1416 - Posted 22 Dec 2005 20:50:17 UTC

                                                                          Last modified: 22 Dec 2005 20:51:34 UTC

                                                                          A program a következ? üzenetet írja ki pár napja,
                                                                          2005.12.22. 20:14:09|SZTAKI Desktop Grid|Message from server: No work sent
                                                                          2005.12.22. 20:14:09|SZTAKI Desktop Grid|Message from server: (reached daily quota of 500 results)
                                                                          ez mit jelent. Közel se járok az 500-hoz. Ez mit?l lehet?
                                                                          ____________

                                                                          Profile kadam
                                                                          Project administrator
                                                                          Avatar
                                                                          Send message
                                                                          Joined: May 25 05
                                                                          Posts: 589
                                                                          Credit: 38,614
                                                                          RAC: 0
                                                                          Message 1419 - Posted 23 Dec 2005 11:59:22 UTC

                                                                            Guess what? So far I\'ve thought that similarly to LHC, the cause of the venue problem is our assimilator. So I\'ve set up a test-environment with everything set to the same as set on SZDG and guess what?
                                                                            Everything works like a charm! Same translated web-pages, same assimilator, same settings and there are no problems, if I change the venue the host gets noticed correctly, the xml files contains correct values...so now I\'ve really no idea what\'s causing the problem on SZDG. Anyways, I\'ll keep searching...
                                                                            ____________
                                                                            If you like BOINC, you may also find CaretCursor to be appealing.

                                                                            Profile Keck_Komputers
                                                                            Avatar
                                                                            Send message
                                                                            Joined: Sep 18 05
                                                                            Posts: 16
                                                                            Credit: 7,898
                                                                            RAC: 0
                                                                            Message 1423 - Posted 23 Dec 2005 22:47:29 UTC - in response to Message 1419.

                                                                              Guess what? So far I\'ve thought that similarly to LHC, the cause of the venue problem is our assimilator. So I\'ve set up a test-environment with everything set to the same as set on SZDG and guess what?
                                                                              Everything works like a charm! Same translated web-pages, same assimilator, same settings and there are no problems, if I change the venue the host gets noticed correctly, the xml files contains correct values...so now I\'ve really no idea what\'s causing the problem on SZDG. Anyways, I\'ll keep searching...

                                                                              Is that a freshly compiled assimilator?
                                                                              ____________
                                                                              BOINC WIKI

                                                                              BOINCing since 2002/12/8

                                                                              Profile Paul D. Buck
                                                                              Send message
                                                                              Joined: Jul 20 05
                                                                              Posts: 35
                                                                              Credit: 57,732
                                                                              RAC: 0
                                                                              Message 1493 - Posted 7 Jan 2006 8:40:21 UTC

                                                                                If it is a compile error, the program was compiled with the wrong header file for example, it would be the scheduler that is the problem.

                                                                                One test of that would be, if you did not mirror the site, would be to copy the scheduler executable from the test side to the live side and try it there ...
                                                                                ____________

                                                                                Profile kadam
                                                                                Project administrator
                                                                                Avatar
                                                                                Send message
                                                                                Joined: May 25 05
                                                                                Posts: 589
                                                                                Credit: 38,614
                                                                                RAC: 0
                                                                                Message 1513 - Posted 12 Jan 2006 19:46:56 UTC - in response to Message 1493.

                                                                                  What I\'ve done is to set up a test environment with literally the same settings that are valid here and I\'ve also copied (no recompile) all the executables for the application (assimilator, validator) from here. Yet, the test environment works perfectly...
                                                                                  ____________
                                                                                  If you like BOINC, you may also find CaretCursor to be appealing.

                                                                                  Grenadier
                                                                                  Avatar
                                                                                  Send message
                                                                                  Joined: Aug 31 05
                                                                                  Posts: 23
                                                                                  Credit: 41,660
                                                                                  RAC: 0
                                                                                  Message 1515 - Posted 12 Jan 2006 20:51:19 UTC - in response to Message 1513.

                                                                                    Last modified: 12 Jan 2006 20:51:49 UTC

                                                                                    What I\'ve done is to set up a test environment with literally the same settings that are valid here and I\'ve also copied (no recompile) all the executables for the application (assimilator, validator) from here. Yet, the test environment works perfectly...


                                                                                    Adam, did you see this post of Paul\'s? Might be as simple as fixing up that SELECT statement.
                                                                                    ____________

                                                                                    Lee Carre
                                                                                    Send message
                                                                                    Joined: Sep 30 05
                                                                                    Posts: 65
                                                                                    Credit: 7,033
                                                                                    RAC: 0
                                                                                    Message 1517 - Posted 13 Jan 2006 6:41:58 UTC - in response to Message 1513.

                                                                                      Last modified: 13 Jan 2006 6:42:20 UTC

                                                                                      What I\'ve done is to set up a test environment with literally the same settings that are valid here and I\'ve also copied (no recompile) all the executables for the application (assimilator, validator) from here. Yet, the test environment works perfectly...

                                                                                      well if the executables work in the test environment, then lets have them over on the production side, get it working, then worry about why it didn\'t work

                                                                                      Profile Raimund Barbeln
                                                                                      Avatar
                                                                                      Send message
                                                                                      Joined: Jul 12 05
                                                                                      Posts: 27
                                                                                      Credit: 84,299
                                                                                      RAC: 0
                                                                                      Message 1521 - Posted 13 Jan 2006 13:47:40 UTC

                                                                                        Adam:

                                                                                        To set up the test environment, did u use a boinc 4 Database and then upgrade to boic 5, or did you use a boinc 5 database from the beginning?
                                                                                        Using a freshly set up boinc 5 database may produce a perfectly running system, where setting up a boin4 Database and the upgrading to boinc5 would probably reproduce the errors we have.


                                                                                        ____________


                                                                                        when life gives you lemons, make lemonade!

                                                                                        Profile Ananas
                                                                                        Send message
                                                                                        Joined: Jul 12 05
                                                                                        Posts: 222
                                                                                        Credit: 665,833
                                                                                        RAC: 0
                                                                                        Message 1523 - Posted 13 Jan 2006 17:01:01 UTC

                                                                                          Last modified: 13 Jan 2006 17:07:59 UTC

                                                                                          I didn\'t download the latest source tree but I think db_parse() are the critical functions (or methods) that can cause things like that.

                                                                                          If (boinc_db.C)\"DB_HOST::db_parse()\" and (schema.sql)\"create table host{}\" are out of sync, it can cause this.

                                                                                          If the real scheme doesn\'t match schema.sql AND db_parse(), it will cause the same effect too of course.


                                                                                          If you could unload the host table scheme into a file and upload it together with the boinc_db.C you\'re using, I could see if I can find something (or send the two files by email)

                                                                                          Profile Paul D. Buck
                                                                                          Send message
                                                                                          Joined: Jul 20 05
                                                                                          Posts: 35
                                                                                          Credit: 57,732
                                                                                          RAC: 0
                                                                                          Message 1549 - Posted 16 Jan 2006 17:19:59 UTC - in response to Message 1523.

                                                                                            If the real scheme doesn\'t match schema.sql AND db_parse(), it will cause the same effect too of course.

                                                                                            Which was the problem on the other project.

                                                                                            The added column wound up at the END of the physical structure, instead of the middle. Because the base code uses SELECT * statements, if the PHYSICAL order in the database is incorrect it will not work.

                                                                                            And as Raimund pointed out, that is the crux of the matter... if the upgrade adds the column in the wrong place ... it will not work.

                                                                                            Sadly, if the columns were enumerated in the base class this type of error would not be an issue. One of the reasons I never used SELECT * or allowed people working for me to use it, it is too easy to break code ...

                                                                                            Worse, it is also an efficiency killer as you pull columns that are not needed increasing database loads to no point.
                                                                                            ____________

                                                                                            John McLeod VII
                                                                                            Avatar
                                                                                            Send message
                                                                                            Joined: Jul 12 05
                                                                                            Posts: 63
                                                                                            Credit: 140,300
                                                                                            RAC: 0
                                                                                            Message 1555 - Posted 17 Jan 2006 2:55:42 UTC - in response to Message 1549.

                                                                                              If the real scheme doesn\'t match schema.sql AND db_parse(), it will cause the same effect too of course.

                                                                                              Which was the problem on the other project.

                                                                                              The added column wound up at the END of the physical structure, instead of the middle. Because the base code uses SELECT * statements, if the PHYSICAL order in the database is incorrect it will not work.

                                                                                              And as Raimund pointed out, that is the crux of the matter... if the upgrade adds the column in the wrong place ... it will not work.

                                                                                              Sadly, if the columns were enumerated in the base class this type of error would not be an issue. One of the reasons I never used SELECT * or allowed people working for me to use it, it is too easy to break code ...

                                                                                              Worse, it is also an efficiency killer as you pull columns that are not needed increasing database loads to no point.

                                                                                              However, every rule needs to be broken occasionally. I have used a select * in a place that I know would have to change if the DB schema ever did, and I needed every column anyway for the calculations.
                                                                                              ____________


                                                                                              BOINC WIKI

                                                                                              Profile Paul D. Buck
                                                                                              Send message
                                                                                              Joined: Jul 20 05
                                                                                              Posts: 35
                                                                                              Credit: 57,732
                                                                                              RAC: 0
                                                                                              Message 1556 - Posted 17 Jan 2006 7:23:48 UTC - in response to Message 1555.

                                                                                                [However, every rule needs to be broken occasionally. I have used a select * in a place that I know would have to change if the DB schema ever did, and I needed every column anyway for the calculations.

                                                                                                No. :)

                                                                                                Not this rule.

                                                                                                So you copy the table create to make the initial select and it is long ... so what? Better to be consistent and bug free than to violate good practice \"one time\" ... in the long run, to avoid \"one time\" from becoming \"almost always\", don\'t break good rules ...

                                                                                                A SELECT * does not run faster than a SELECT with all column names listed. Besides, if you change the column order, one more place you don\'t have to change ... or remember ... or someone else to make a change and break your system ...
                                                                                                ____________

                                                                                                John McLeod VII
                                                                                                Avatar
                                                                                                Send message
                                                                                                Joined: Jul 12 05
                                                                                                Posts: 63
                                                                                                Credit: 140,300
                                                                                                RAC: 0
                                                                                                Message 1607 - Posted 3 Feb 2006 0:10:49 UTC

                                                                                                  What is the status of the daily quota exceed problem?
                                                                                                  ____________


                                                                                                  BOINC WIKI

                                                                                                  Profile Nikolay A. Saharov
                                                                                                  Send message
                                                                                                  Joined: Jul 13 05
                                                                                                  Posts: 9
                                                                                                  Credit: 56,901
                                                                                                  RAC: 32
                                                                                                  Message 1618 - Posted 4 Feb 2006 9:48:15 UTC

                                                                                                    Are there any news about wrong HOST location and ZERO granted results?
                                                                                                    ____________

                                                                                                    Profile kadam
                                                                                                    Project administrator
                                                                                                    Avatar
                                                                                                    Send message
                                                                                                    Joined: May 25 05
                                                                                                    Posts: 589
                                                                                                    Credit: 38,614
                                                                                                    RAC: 0
                                                                                                    Message 1643 - Posted 8 Feb 2006 13:29:04 UTC - in response to Message 1636.

                                                                                                      Ok, I think I owe everyone an appologize! I thought I would do best if I only tackle with the problems and solve them as soon as possible, but I couldn\'t so far. So everyone who has an idea what could have gone wrong is warmly welcomed.

                                                                                                      Something went wrong when I merged the database from 4.x to 5.x. (don\'t ask whether the columns match, cause I\'ve checked it a thousands time)
                                                                                                      Now, I\'ve installed a new test server...pure 5.x, nothing 4.x related, than merged the user table of the 4.x database...and the same problems arose there...
                                                                                                      ____________
                                                                                                      If you like BOINC, you may also find CaretCursor to be appealing.

                                                                                                      Profile Contact
                                                                                                      Avatar
                                                                                                      Send message
                                                                                                      Joined: Jul 12 05
                                                                                                      Posts: 22
                                                                                                      Credit: 98,383
                                                                                                      RAC: 0
                                                                                                      Message 1645 - Posted 8 Feb 2006 13:42:23 UTC

                                                                                                        Big news!
                                                                                                        08/02/06 8:48:23 AM|SZTAKI Desktop Grid|New host venue: home

                                                                                                        ____________

                                                                                                        Click and enter your name for your BOINC Statistics

                                                                                                        Profile kadam
                                                                                                        Project administrator
                                                                                                        Avatar
                                                                                                        Send message
                                                                                                        Joined: May 25 05
                                                                                                        Posts: 589
                                                                                                        Credit: 38,614
                                                                                                        RAC: 0
                                                                                                        Message 1647 - Posted 8 Feb 2006 14:05:33 UTC - in response to Message 1645.

                                                                                                          Yeah, after tackleing around with the database for hours it seemed something has happened...
                                                                                                          ...I really don\'t want to halloo till we are out of the wood, but it seemes I\'ve found something finally...
                                                                                                          ____________
                                                                                                          If you like BOINC, you may also find CaretCursor to be appealing.

                                                                                                          Profile Nightbird
                                                                                                          Forum moderator
                                                                                                          Avatar
                                                                                                          Send message
                                                                                                          Joined: Jul 12 05
                                                                                                          Posts: 920
                                                                                                          Credit: 114,924
                                                                                                          RAC: 0
                                                                                                          Message 1648 - Posted 8 Feb 2006 16:21:47 UTC - in response to Message 1647.

                                                                                                            Yeah, after tackleing around with the database for hours it seemed something has happened...
                                                                                                            ...I really don\'t want to halloo till we are out of the wood, but it seemes I\'ve found something finally...

                                                                                                            And if the problem was (in) the 4.x database ??

                                                                                                            ____________

                                                                                                            Profile Nightbird
                                                                                                            Forum moderator
                                                                                                            Avatar
                                                                                                            Send message
                                                                                                            Joined: Jul 12 05
                                                                                                            Posts: 920
                                                                                                            Credit: 114,924
                                                                                                            RAC: 0
                                                                                                            Message 1649 - Posted 8 Feb 2006 16:30:55 UTC - in response to Message 1645.

                                                                                                              Last modified: 8 Feb 2006 16:40:32 UTC

                                                                                                              Big news!
                                                                                                              08/02/06 8:48:23 AM|SZTAKI Desktop Grid|New host venue: home

                                                                                                              A miracle !!
                                                                                                              Me too (and for my 3 machines), i see \"Home\" !

                                                                                                              and The Best :
                                                                                                              on BoincSynergy, my stats are OK and perfect, for the first time since the upgrade to the version 5 !

                                                                                                              but it seemes I\'ve found something finally...
                                                                                                              Yes, you found something, you\'re definitively on the road !
                                                                                                              Thanks :)

                                                                                                              ____________

                                                                                                              Profile Nikolay A. Saharov
                                                                                                              Send message
                                                                                                              Joined: Jul 13 05
                                                                                                              Posts: 9
                                                                                                              Credit: 56,901
                                                                                                              RAC: 32
                                                                                                              Message 1660 - Posted 8 Feb 2006 20:05:55 UTC - in response to Message 1645.

                                                                                                                Big news!
                                                                                                                08/02/06 8:48:23 AM|SZTAKI Desktop Grid|New host venue: home

                                                                                                                Yes, I also have correct home venue now :) Thanks!

                                                                                                                Lee Carre
                                                                                                                Send message
                                                                                                                Joined: Sep 30 05
                                                                                                                Posts: 65
                                                                                                                Credit: 7,033
                                                                                                                RAC: 0
                                                                                                                Message 1720 - Posted 11 Feb 2006 2:39:25 UTC

                                                                                                                  Last modified: 11 Feb 2006 2:45:09 UTC

                                                                                                                  thanks adam :)
                                                                                                                  venues are functional again for my hosts

                                                                                                                  Post to thread

                                                                                                                  Message boards : SZTAKI Desktop Grid : Ad@m\'s BLOG (page 2)


                                                                                                                  Home | My Account | Message Boards


                                                                                                                  Copyright © 2017 SZTAKI Desktop Grid