New applications 1.12 online - Feedback


Advanced search

Message boards : SZTAKI Desktop Grid : New applications 1.12 online - Feedback

AuthorMessage
Profile kadam
Project administrator
Avatar
Send message
Joined: May 25 05
Posts: 589
Credit: 38,614
RAC: 0
Message 2763 - Posted 25 May 2006 14:51:17 UTC

    Last modified: 25 May 2006 14:52:17 UTC

    Platform - Current version
    Linux/x86 - 1.12 (no change since 1.11)
    Windows/x86 - 1.12 (no change since 1.10)
    Macintosh/powerpc - 1.12
    Sun - 1.12

    Feedback - all of the platforms now features the new code, hope the mac problem is also solved by now

    ____________
    If you like BOINC, you may also find CaretCursor to be appealing.

    Profile Kahrs
    Send message
    Joined: Mar 21 06
    Posts: 8
    Credit: 77,451
    RAC: 0
    Message 2766 - Posted 25 May 2006 18:02:09 UTC - in response to Message 2763.

      Seems that works everything very proper for all my MACs, no further errors on Darwin 7.9.0. It also seems, that Start/Stop of computing doesn\'t hurt the results, earlier often result 0 when calculation was restarted.

      thanks ...
      ____________

      Odysseus
      Avatar
      Send message
      Joined: Feb 27 06
      Posts: 212
      Credit: 221,397
      RAC: 0
      Message 2767 - Posted 25 May 2006 19:00:37 UTC - in response to Message 2766.

        Seems that works everything very proper for all my MACs, no further errors on Darwin 7.9.0.

        I too am seeing an improvement on my Mac. It got the error on all the WUs it had allocated to v1.11 last night, but now, using v1.12, it appears to have worked through a couple more without problems. These results haven\'t been uploaded yet; I\'ll be sure to keep an eye on them and report any errors or validation failures.

        Thanks, Adam, for the rapid response!
        ____________

        Odysseus
        Avatar
        Send message
        Joined: Feb 27 06
        Posts: 212
        Credit: 221,397
        RAC: 0
        Message 2776 - Posted 26 May 2006 16:48:34 UTC

          Mac v1.12 is processing without errors on my G4 server, but so far half the results are invalid. See nos. 2871037 & 2871061.
          ____________

          Profile Nightbird
          Forum moderator
          Avatar
          Send message
          Joined: Jul 12 05
          Posts: 920
          Credit: 114,924
          RAC: 0
          Message 2777 - Posted 26 May 2006 17:39:10 UTC

            Last modified: 26 May 2006 23:34:22 UTC

            Ehm, you\'re not alone.
            Found others invalid Mac 1.12 wus (and without checkpoint)
            but many Mac 1.12 wus are also valid.

            same for Linux 1.12, found this one :
            http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/workunit.php?wuid=760481
            but this one (same machine -> computer 4939) is valid
            http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/workunit.php?wuid=687197

            ehm, with a Sun machine
            http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=2896828
            but why ?
            the others wus are valid

            ____________

            Profile Nightbird
            Forum moderator
            Avatar
            Send message
            Joined: Jul 12 05
            Posts: 920
            Credit: 114,924
            RAC: 0
            Message 2783 - Posted 28 May 2006 13:56:10 UTC

              Nice Mac 1.12 wu with checkpoint working :
              http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=2873304

              Computer ID 15576
              Report deadline 4 Jun 2006 11:50:52 UTC
              CPU time (sec) 3867.106161
              stderr out <core_client_version>5.4.9</core_client_version>
              <stderr_txt>
              Initialized: Lines to process 200
              Starting with line 1
              Initialized: Lines to process 200
              Restarting from checkpoint: Lines processed so far 1
              Starting with line 2
              Initialized: Lines to process 200
              Restarting from checkpoint: Lines processed so far 155
              Starting with line 156
              End of process: Number of lines processed: 200
              Input processed...notifying core client


              </stderr_txt>


              Validate state Valid

              ____________

              Profile Nightbird
              Forum moderator
              Avatar
              Send message
              Joined: Jul 12 05
              Posts: 920
              Credit: 114,924
              RAC: 0
              Message 2784 - Posted 29 May 2006 3:05:10 UTC

                @ Phil68

                This wu (without checkpoint) is invalid :
                Workunit 699363
                CPU time (sec) 2769.78
                stderr out <core_client_version>4.43</core_client_version>
                <stderr_txt>
                Initialized: Lines to process 200
                Starting with line 1
                End of process: Number of lines processed: 200
                Input processed...notifying core client

                </stderr_txt>

                Validate state Invalid
                -----------
                Nothing special ?
                -----------

                But this one with chechpoint is valid :)
                Workunit 775245
                CPU time (sec) 2378.54
                stderr out <core_client_version>4.43</core_client_version>
                <stderr_txt>
                Initialized: Lines to process 200
                Starting with line 1
                Initialized: Lines to process 200
                Restarting from checkpoint: Lines processed so far 191
                Starting with line 192
                End of process: Number of lines processed: 200
                Input processed...notifying core client

                </stderr_txt>

                Validate state Valid

                ____________

                Profile Rebirther
                Avatar
                Send message
                Joined: Jul 12 05
                Posts: 81
                Credit: 15,472
                RAC: 0
                Message 2859 - Posted 1 Jun 2006 21:20:03 UTC

                  Last modified: 1 Jun 2006 21:24:27 UTC

                  Boinc 5.4.9, result is invalid (don`t know why?):
                  http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3064048

                  Profile Rebirther
                  Avatar
                  Send message
                  Joined: Jul 12 05
                  Posts: 81
                  Credit: 15,472
                  RAC: 0
                  Message 2863 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 8:00:15 UTC

                    Last modified: 2 Jun 2006 8:03:40 UTC

                    3 more invalid :(
                    http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3076404
                    http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3068811
                    http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3063936

                    @Adam: Can you take a look into these pls and validate or what is wrong with these after successful returned?

                    Edit: I have seen more users with the same problem!

                    Profile Ananas
                    Send message
                    Joined: Jul 12 05
                    Posts: 222
                    Credit: 665,833
                    RAC: 0
                    Message 2864 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 9:02:41 UTC

                      Last modified: 2 Jun 2006 9:04:29 UTC

                      I have invalid results too now and then lately - but of course I cannot tell wether it comes from using the optimized client (I don\'t think it\'s that) or from the validator or rounding problems.

                      It is not the majority of results, just now and then such a sneaky \"invalid\" comes along :-/

                      Profile Rebirther
                      Avatar
                      Send message
                      Joined: Jul 12 05
                      Posts: 81
                      Credit: 15,472
                      RAC: 0
                      Message 2865 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 9:18:41 UTC - in response to Message 2864.

                        I have invalid results too now and then lately - but of course I cannot tell wether it comes from using the optimized client (I don\'t think it\'s that) or from the validator or rounding problems.

                        It is not the majority of results, just now and then such a sneaky \"invalid\" comes along :-/


                        Its not the optimized app. I have checked several machines here as mac with the same problem.

                        akosf
                        Avatar
                        Send message
                        Joined: Aug 30 05
                        Posts: 62
                        Credit: 510,419
                        RAC: 0
                        Message 2867 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 9:40:08 UTC - in response to Message 2864.

                          Last modified: 2 Jun 2006 9:41:06 UTC

                          I have invalid results too now and then lately - but of course I cannot tell wether it comes from using the optimized client (I don\'t think it\'s that) or from the validator or rounding problems.

                          Rounding isn\'t possible, the application uses only whole numbers.

                          Profile Rebirther
                          Avatar
                          Send message
                          Joined: Jul 12 05
                          Posts: 81
                          Credit: 15,472
                          RAC: 0
                          Message 2869 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 9:50:13 UTC

                            One more \"cry\"
                            http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3068730

                            akosf
                            Avatar
                            Send message
                            Joined: Aug 30 05
                            Posts: 62
                            Credit: 510,419
                            RAC: 0
                            Message 2870 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 9:54:28 UTC - in response to Message 2869.

                              Last modified: 2 Jun 2006 10:08:14 UTC

                              One more \"cry\"
                              http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3068730

                              Do you use a modified code?

                              I will check the unrolling in sdg11202 and sdg11203.

                              edit: sdg11202 had a stack correction problem.

                              Profile Rebirther
                              Avatar
                              Send message
                              Joined: Jul 12 05
                              Posts: 81
                              Credit: 15,472
                              RAC: 0
                              Message 2871 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 9:55:26 UTC

                                Checkpoint works fine but now I watched this:
                                After 2min I restarted Boinc, progressbar shown last position correctly but cpu-time began from zero! So 2min were lost...

                                Profile Rebirther
                                Avatar
                                Send message
                                Joined: Jul 12 05
                                Posts: 81
                                Credit: 15,472
                                RAC: 0
                                Message 2876 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 13:46:17 UTC - in response to Message 2870.

                                  One more \"cry\"
                                  http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3068730

                                  Do you use a modified code?

                                  I will check the unrolling in sdg11202 and sdg11203.

                                  edit: sdg11202 had a stack correction problem.


                                  Iam using now sdg11203. It seems that the validator is too aggressive with different OS and CPU. I will watching out results with newest version and tell you if something is going wrong.

                                  Profile MRAO
                                  Avatar
                                  Send message
                                  Joined: May 9 06
                                  Posts: 30
                                  Credit: 23,802
                                  RAC: 0
                                  Message 2879 - Posted 2 Jun 2006 21:08:50 UTC

                                    Last modified: 2 Jun 2006 21:17:23 UTC

                                    Akos, I seem to be getting a trickle of invalid results since switching to sdg11202 and sdg11203. See:

                                    http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3084928
                                    http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3084854
                                    http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3083474
                                    http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3073084

                                    for example. That\'s about 1 in 5 of my recent results validated in the last few days. All on the same P3, not overclocked or anything odd, though it is a dual processor machine. This doesn\'t seem to be affecting the science at the moment, other results for the WUs are valid. All these results ran straight through without interruption. I\'ve had a couple of results invalid similarly on other computers. Mike
                                    ____________

                                    Profile Rebirther
                                    Avatar
                                    Send message
                                    Joined: Jul 12 05
                                    Posts: 81
                                    Credit: 15,472
                                    RAC: 0
                                    Message 2884 - Posted 3 Jun 2006 10:04:57 UTC

                                      Invalid results at this time (conclusion)
                                      sdg11202:
                                      http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3076404
                                      http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3068811
                                      http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3063936
                                      http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3064048
                                      http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3068730

                                      sdg11203:
                                      http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3079790
                                      http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3087344
                                      http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3073095
                                      http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3087267
                                      http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3087119
                                      http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3063970
                                      http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3087292
                                      http://szdg.lpds.sztaki.hu/szdg/result.php?resultid=3087347

                                      I will stop crunching as long as this is fixed (validator)

                                      akosf
                                      Avatar
                                      Send message
                                      Joined: Aug 30 05
                                      Posts: 62
                                      Credit: 510,419
                                      RAC: 0
                                      Message 2885 - Posted 3 Jun 2006 10:10:58 UTC

                                        Last modified: 3 Jun 2006 10:11:26 UTC

                                        I got only one invalid results with sdg11203 and i think it comes from the validator. I saw that some computers got zero credits with the official application too in same cases.

                                        vonHalenbach
                                        Send message
                                        Joined: May 31 06
                                        Posts: 25
                                        Credit: 461
                                        RAC: 0
                                        Message 2923 - Posted 5 Jun 2006 16:27:15 UTC

                                          Hi Adam !
                                          I use the Linux Core client 5.2.13 and 1.12 for crunching.
                                          Im new to SZtaki and have seen once in a while were workunits sneaking in that don\'t validate. I don\'t know if it is my computer (800 Mhz not overclicked) or the validator or the client. This has to be analysed in deph.

                                          WU:
                                          837395

                                          Nice Greetings from Germany

                                          vonHalenbach
                                          ____________

                                          Profile Rebirther
                                          Avatar
                                          Send message
                                          Joined: Jul 12 05
                                          Posts: 81
                                          Credit: 15,472
                                          RAC: 0
                                          Message 2924 - Posted 5 Jun 2006 18:07:33 UTC

                                            Thx for validate my zero credits :D

                                            Profile Nightbird
                                            Forum moderator
                                            Avatar
                                            Send message
                                            Joined: Jul 12 05
                                            Posts: 920
                                            Credit: 114,924
                                            RAC: 0
                                            Message 2926 - Posted 5 Jun 2006 18:17:55 UTC - in response to Message 2923.

                                              Last modified: 5 Jun 2006 18:21:43 UTC

                                              Hi Adam !
                                              I use the Linux Core client 5.2.13 and 1.12 for crunching.
                                              Im new to SZtaki and have seen once in a while were workunits sneaking in that don\'t validate. I don\'t know if it is my computer (800 Mhz not overclicked) or the validator or the client. This has to be analysed in deph.

                                              WU:
                                              837395

                                              Nice Greetings from Germany

                                              vonHalenbach

                                              2 wus (837395/813174) were invalid (presently, i don\'t know why) but credits are granted now.
                                              ____________

                                              vonHalenbach
                                              Send message
                                              Joined: May 31 06
                                              Posts: 25
                                              Credit: 461
                                              RAC: 0
                                              Message 2933 - Posted 5 Jun 2006 21:14:19 UTC - in response to Message 2926.

                                                Hi Adam !
                                                I use the Linux Core client 5.2.13 and 1.12 for crunching.
                                                Im new to SZtaki and have seen once in a while were workunits sneaking in that don\'t validate. I don\'t know if it is my computer (800 Mhz not overclicked) or the validator or the client. This has to be analysed in deph.

                                                WU:
                                                837395

                                                Nice Greetings from Germany

                                                vonHalenbach

                                                2 wus (837395/813174) were invalid (presently, i don\'t know why) but credits are granted now.


                                                Hello Nightbird. Thank you for your response, but i must say im not interested in credits. I do that for fun.
                                                ____________

                                                Profile Nightbird
                                                Forum moderator
                                                Avatar
                                                Send message
                                                Joined: Jul 12 05
                                                Posts: 920
                                                Credit: 114,924
                                                RAC: 0
                                                Message 3259 - Posted 29 Jun 2006 1:05:39 UTC

                                                  Last modified: 29 Jun 2006 1:08:53 UTC

                                                  Thread \"New applications 1.13 - 1.14 online - Feedback\" is opened.
                                                  ____________

                                                  Post to thread

                                                  Message boards : SZTAKI Desktop Grid : New applications 1.12 online - Feedback


                                                  Home | My Account | Message Boards


                                                  Copyright © 2017 SZTAKI Desktop Grid